Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/02/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica m10
From: photo.forrest at (Phil Forrest)
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 20:58:10 -0500
References: <> <> <00cf01cce5f4$178e89a0$46ab9ce0$>

That's what I said. 
I just wish they would make a dedicated R series digital. Full frame.
Same lens compatibility as the past several models. Of course, maybe
they think the S2 is that solution. Ridiculous.

Phil Forrest

On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 15:56:20 -0800
"Frank Filippone" <red735i at> wrote:

> I'll say it again....
> It is not about selling cameras.  It is about selling lenses (and
> accessories.... $200 for a battery?), where they make their
> profits....
> Example.... whatever a Noctilux costs now...... 
> Think Gillette.... 
> Frank Filippone
> Red735i at
> That puts them in a big hurry to undercut themselves competing with
> themselves so people can get into Leica for a decimal point less than
> that?
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See for more information

In reply to: Message from hopsternew at (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] leica m10)
Message from mark at (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Leica m10)
Message from red735i at (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Leica m10)