Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/02/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica m10
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:36:09 -0500

>From all I hear it now takes tens of thousands of dollars to get into Leica
and they cant turn the stuff out faster enough.
That puts them in a big hurry to undercut themselves competing with
themselves so people can get into Leica for a decimal point less than that?

-- 
Mark R.
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/winterdays/


> From: Geoff Hopkinson <hopsternew at gmail.com>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 08:31:40 +1000
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] leica m10
> 
> I wouldn't be surprised to see an announcement of a new camera system from
> Leica Camera at Solms. Mirrorless would be a good guess.
> I don't think that the features wished for in the forums will be seen in an
> M10.
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/hoppyman/g/Contax+AX.jpg.html
> 
> Cheers,
> Geoff
> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman
> 
> 
> 
> On 8 February 2012 04:49, wildlightphoto at earthlink.net <
> wildlightphoto at earthlink.net> wrote:
> 
>> mehrdad wrote:
>> 
>>>>> 
>> do you remember the contax ax? it is very possible
>> <<<
>> 
>> Possible but not practical.  Plays havoc with floating elements and
>> tri-elmars, and absent a much thicker body would have a useful range only
>> with shorter lenses.
>> 
>> Doug Herr
>> Birdman of Sacramento
>> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
>> 
>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Jayanand Govindaraj
>> <jayanand at gmail.com>wrote:
>> 
>>> Autofocus!
>>> Cheers
>>> Jayanand
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPad
>>> 
>>> On 08-Feb-2012, at 12:06 AM, mehrdad <msadat at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> it seems that the new m digital is around the corner (sep/oct), what
>>> shall
>>>> we expect after three years and 8k price?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> i for one do need the following
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 1) image stabilization built in to the body (they can licsnce this
>>>> technology  from sony, thier old partner)
>>>> 2) much better buffer and more frames per second
>>>> 3) shooting movies with m (not for me)
>>>> 4) fuji x10/pro like view finder
>>>> 5) better battery life and better battery
>>>> 6) 36 meg is now the norm, so something close
>>>> 7) a built in 1.4x magnifier, that u can use at will
>>>> 8) all the given dynamic range and high iso performance (it is now
>> three
>>>> yrs later)
>>>> 9) a better price but i think is is truly a dream
>>>> 10) do we care about live view?
>>>> --
>>>>  -------------------------------------
>>>>  regards, mehrdad
>>>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




Replies: Reply from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Leica m10)
In reply to: Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] leica m10)