Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/12/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Nathan Wajsman OFFERED:: > to try to rationalize photo equipment purchases from a financial point of > view is futile<<<< Absolutely!!!!!!! :-) My first 2 1/4 camera was a Rolleicord. Had it for 23 days, of course it worked fine. HOWEVER???? :-) As I read more and more photo magazines in the following days and stories about many of the "great shooters" of the early '50's they were using Rolleiflex! I returned the Rolleicord, they allowed me 50% trade in after only 23 days and I gave them the box and all the paper work. It wouldn't surprise me they sold it again as "New!" By the way the Rolleiflex cost $310.00 Cdn. We eventually learn it isn't the equipment, (it helps depending on your assignment requirements) but the person holding it that observes the moment and "CLICK!" "If I only had a Rollieflex, my pictures would be so much better!" I fretted over this for 23 days , then finally walked into my favourite camera store, I think at the time I might have been their favourite customer! :-) As I was always just going to "LOOK?" :-) But always came out with something new because I just had to have the best! I was always in debt because quite often I never asked the price ? It was "I need !" And it was handed to me and it went on my account and I eventually paid for it. :-) Sooner or later experience kick's in and you learn......... "I don't really need that lens! Just take two steps closer!" And you'll be fine. However for some of us slower learners? ;-) It really take's time. :-) cheers, Dr. ted