Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/07/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Yes to be clear 1:1 focusing macro glass pre AF days were rare but they did exist.. Its what I mean which counts not what I write. In my direct experience my 105 micro Nikor did not go to 1:1 but the AF version I got when that came out did. I found the 60 more useful. One of my dream lenes for decades was the 120 f4 CFI Makro Planar T* which I finally landed in 2001 only goes on its own to 1:4.5 making for a = 10.125 square inch minimum image size from side to side. When the Contax 645 Apo-Makro-Planar T* 120mm f/4 came out I wondered if it was better it was internal focusing and auto focus and the schematic was not even similar to my classic version. I' betting it went to 1:1 or darned close. You make a macro lens nowadays which does not got to 1:1 and people wont talk to you. And now canon has come out with one which goes even closer. I got a tube but never used it. Used. For like 30 bucks. Mark William Rabiner Photography > From: Doug Herr <wildlightphoto at earthlink.net> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 07:03:41 -0700 (GMT-07:00) > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Subject: Re: [Leica] (FF) waned > > Mark Rabiner wrote: > >> Any Nikon or Canon lens needed a tube before AF. With auto focus for some >> reason THEN they'd then go to 1:1. >> The Leica's did not use tubes but "ELPRO' s" which were multi element >> close >> up filters in a barrel and I think came with most of the Leica lenses to >> get 1:1. > > IIRC an early pre-set version of the 55mm f/3.5 Micro-Nikkor would focus to > 1:1 without extension tubes, and there might have been a Pentax 1:1 macro > lens > as well (not certain). Canon, Minolta, Nikon and Leica Macro lenses > typically > would focus to 1:2 with an accessory extension tube required for 1:1 > reproduction ratio. The Olympus OM system was particularly strong in the > macro area; I believe the 'normal' Oly macro lens also required a tube for > a > 1:1 reproduction ratio. > > AF has a hard time with long focussing helixes so this feature pushed lens > design to internal focus for macro lenses, allowing 1:1 reproduction ratios > without an accessory tube, at the cost of closer working distances. > > Leica's ELRPO lenses were made is several flavors. One was intended for > the > 100mm APO Macro which allowed 1:1 reproduction ratio, but most ELPRO lenses > were intended for normal-focus 50mm 'cron, 90mm and 135mm R lenses. At > best > these ELPRO lesnes would allow 1:2 reproduction ratio. Though not > specifically made for them, some of the ELPROs would also fit the early > 80-200 > f/4.5 and 75-200mm f/4.5 zooms and 180mm f/4 Elmar-R. > > Doug Herr > Birdman of Sacramento > http://www.wildlightphoto.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information