Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/05/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]So, have I got this right, if you only ever look at your pictures using a loupe to study the negative then film is sharper than digital in your opinion? FD On 30 May, 2011, at 05:54, Frank Filippone wrote: > I was making a comparison of the primary output from film vs digital. In > my > mind, it removes the variables of scanning, printer drivers ( including the > driver that takes in 300 dpi and outputs 1600 dpi ink + dithering) , user > SW > capability, etc. > > If the primary source is better, then the secondary output will be > better.... ie, the print. > > I've heard all the arguments, seen the comparison prints, followed the > logic..... but it all fails in my mind due to the variables involved...or > the skew in the data used. > > Go back to the primary output and make the comparison there..... Reduce > variables. > > Frank Filippone > Red735i at earthlink.net > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information