Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/04/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Bob, I do think that the premium paper both looks and feels better. As for sharpening, I don't apply any. If you think that the images are not sharp enough in the small 7x7 size, then something is wrong--either the images are not sharp to begin with or something went wrong in the printing process. I love Blurb and use it at my basic "printer" these days, but I have heard people complaining of occasional quality problems. Have not had any myself, though. Cheers, Nathan Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu http://www.greatpix.eu http://www.nathanfoto.com PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog YNWA On Apr 26, 2011, at 2:05 AM, Robert Baron wrote: > I just made a small blurb.com photo book to try it out. I'm semi-happy > with > it but I've got a couple of questions for the blurbists on the LUG: > > I had the 7" square version printed on premium paper. What is the visible > difference between images printed on it versus regular paper, if any, or is > it just heavier and/or supposedly more archival? > > The instructions tell you to upload image files without sharpening. So I > did. And I think the printed pages could be somewhat sharper, although I > may be overly critical. What do you all do re: sharpening? > > I think I like this concept for preserving family photos and showing off > small personal projects but it could be a slight bit better and I'd be that > much happier. > > Thanks, > > --Bob > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >