Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/02/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Compare: Imacon vs. Epson Scanner
From: s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov)
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 01:49:41 -0800
References: <04BD9D2E-3EC9-4A4E-9CB2-2AD995F97683@gmail.com> <C9888EB2.AF5D%mark@rabinergroup.com> <AANLkTikOL3p19Pt4CNvZqp2REQFrkb1fmMousQ72GeAH@mail.gmail.com>

I keep waiting for a new Epson to hit the market. I'm thinking that they are 
done with development in that area.
S.d.


On Feb 22, 2011, at 12:28 AM, Daniel Ridings wrote:

> Yeah, I wouldn't pay extra for the Imacon. I would have thought I would 
> have ...
> 
> I'm still using an even older model of the Epson. I probably better
> pick up a new one before they disappear from the market.
> 
> Daniel
> 
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 3:50 AM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> 
> wrote:
>> The Imacon scan at this magnification looks like the same scan as the 
>> Epson
>> only with 10% more unsharp mask.
>> 
>> 
>> --------------------
>> Mark William Rabiner
>> Photography
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
>> mark at rabinergroup.com
>> Cars:   http://tinyurl.com/2f7ptxb
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> From: Lluis Ripoll Querol <lluisripollquerol at gmail.com>
>>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>>> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 02:40:29 +0100
>>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>>> Subject: [Leica] Compare: Imacon vs Epson Scanner
>>> 
>>> Just a test after our conversations about scanners, I suppose will be
>>> interesting for all
>>> 
>>> I've gave to my professional Lab a 6x6 negative to be scanned on their
>>> Imacon Flextight 848, later I have scanned the same negative with my
>>> Epson 3170, here you can compare:
>>> 
>>> (PLEASE VIEW LARGE)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> With Epson
>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/2011020101wEP.jpg.html
>>> 
>>> With Imacon
>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/2011020101wIM.jpg.html
>>> 
>>> A detail with Epson
>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/2011020101crwEP.jpg.html
>>> 
>>> A detail with Imacon
>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/2011020101crwIM.jpg.html
>>> 
>>> Pictures with Rolleiflex TLR, Zeiss Planar 2.8/80mm, Tri X 320 ISO
>>> 
>>> A big difference!, in price too!. I can't afford an Imacon, but I can
>>> gave them my best negatives to scann.
>>> 
>>> Saludos cordiales
>>> Lluis
>>> 
>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/
>>> http://photo.net/photos/lluisripoll
>>> Blog:
>>> http://lluisripollphotography.wordpress.com/
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from daniel at dlridings.se (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] Compare: Imacon vs. Epson Scanner)
In reply to: Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] Compare: Imacon vs Epson Scanner)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Compare: Imacon vs. Epson Scanner)
Message from daniel at dlridings.se (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] Compare: Imacon vs. Epson Scanner)