Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/02/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Ricoh and the M mount
From: red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone)
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 06:52:02 -0800
References: <A69C8DEB-38C3-4CB5-ADAE-3B92A0455A2D@yahoo.co.uk>

APS-C = 25.1 x 16.7mm = 419.17
M8 = 27x18mm = 486

An area difference of 66.83 or 13.75%.

What you are missing is that running around with a single camera on a fine
travel vacation makes me quite nervous.  I prefer to always carry a backup.
In the digital M world, that backup would cost $2K +++ ( used M8 ) or $7K
(new M9).  I don't have a few "thou" hanging around to buy a backup digi-M.
A backup at a few hundred would be most welcome, even if it did have a
13.75% smaller CCD sensor, and a EVF.  In a broken-camera pinch, it may be a
lifesaver......

BTW, as I have found less suitable ( read that as costing way too much)
backup in the digi-World, I use my M6 as the backup, and carry a few rolls
of film, just in case....

I find this whole backup requirement of mine to be a real pain.  It is
pretty specific to Leica.... let me explain....

If you are traveling in some obscure part of the world, and your Canon or
Nikon ( or substitute, Sony, Minolta, or other) top of the line camera goes
haywire, you COULD go to a local dealer and buy a medium or bottom of the
line camera and use it for the rest of your trip..  Use the existing lenses
you brought over with you.  You get your pictures with only a small delay
and out of pocket cost.  With Leica, that breakdown of your M8 or M9 will be
almost non-replaceable and if you are lucky enough to find a local dealer,
the replacement cost is anywhere between $2-7K, if he has one in stock.

What am I getting at?  If you believe in a backup camera and you believe in
Digital Leica, then you must find some form of backup solution that works
for your pocketbook.  For now, it is a M6 and film and a scanner for me.

I wish it were not.

Those professionals ( or amateurs that can afford 2 Digi-M's) out there may
have a different cut on this, and I would expect so.  Consider the limited
budget amateur's needs..... very different.

Frank Filippone
Red735i at earthlink.net


-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+red735i=earthlink.net at leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+red735i=earthlink.net at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
Peter Cheyne
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 11:21 PM
To: lug at leica-users.org
Subject: [Leica] Ricoh and the M mount

The M8 is an APS-H.  It is larger than the APS-C.

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Ricoh and the M mount)
Reply from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Ricoh and the M mount)
In reply to: Message from geordiepete211 at yahoo.co.uk (Peter Cheyne) ([Leica] Ricoh and the M mount)