Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/11/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M9 and lenses
From: sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter)
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 20:05:36 -0600
References: <4CED898A.7010002@mcclary.net> <BF3D0C23-12CC-4B3F-817C-0817798DBEB2@shaw.ca>

I really loved my vers 3, and made many successful photos with it.   I am
happy to have bought the asph 35, but I was silly to have sold the vers 3.

On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 6:01 PM, John Collier <jbcollier at shaw.ca> wrote:

> The version 4 Summicron is reknown for its rendering of out of focus areas
> when focussed in the middle distance and apertures: more specifically, the
> transition areas. That's it. That's all she wrote. All the Summicrons were
> very good lenses period and especially so in their day.
>
> John
>
> On 2010-11-24, at 2:54 PM, Harrison McClary wrote:
>
> > So anyway even though the "common wisdom" is that the 35 'cron v3 is no
> good, I will differ on this assessment.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
Regards,

Sonny
http://sonc.com/look/
Natchitoches, Louisiana

USA


In reply to: Message from lists at mcclary.net (Harrison McClary) ([Leica] M9 and lenses)
Message from jbcollier at shaw.ca (John Collier) ([Leica] M9 and lenses)