Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/11/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I've used the ZM 21mm f/2.8 for about a year and a half now. it's one of my favorite lenses. I had a period when I thought about selling it when I was using an RD1 and never grabbed the 21mm. Now that I've got the M9, it's fantastic. I find that the coding for a 21mm Elmarit pre-ASPH works very well and takes away all the color fringe vigneting. I've tried the ASPH Elmarit and it does not work as well with the ZM. The 18mm super elmar code is good but I don't think as good as the 21mm. I haven't tried the 24mm Elmarit coding yet but from what I've read with its compatibility with the 15mm CV lens, it may overcorrect and vignette with hot corners, not sure. The falloff is not bad at all with no coding but it's noticeable. After coding the lens, it's fantastic. Just a little bit of falloff but we expect that in a superwide like this. I highly recommend the 21mm zm lens. The ONLY thing you may "lose" is the insane build quality of the Leica Elmarit lens, but you also save well over $1000 in the price difference between the two. The ZM lens is very well made and I can't find any distortion. I only use an empty deep 46mm filter ring as a hood since the hoods for these carry almost the same price as some of the Leica variants. This lens is really resistant to flare anyways, so the biggest thing is protecting the front element. Heavystar on ebay sells some cheap screw in hoods which work well if slightly modified I think. I have the 46mm "wide" metal one which worked well on the M8 but mechanically vignettes a small amount on the M9. I may just dremel out the offending corners and make my own flower petal type hood for it. Until then the filter ring is fine. It's an awesome lens. Phil Forrest On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 13:19:45 -0600 Chris Williams <zoeica at mac.com> wrote: > Yes the 21/2.8 Zeiss for Leica. I think it was PDN or another > magazine that rated that lens(they were testing the Nikon mount > version) as one of the best wide angle lenses they've ever used. > > First shot with it on the M8 and then later with the M9. Very little > if any CA when editing in LR, which is a plus for me because so many > Nikkor and Canon lenses show CA when imported into LR. I first used > it on a bridal session in NOLA and I was hooked. > > Philip Forrest is using his on the M9 now I believe, maybe he'll > chime in as well. > > > > > > > Chris Williams > www.zoeicaimages.net > www.rebirthworkshops.com > 504-231-6261 > > > > > On Nov 15, 2010, at 1:10 PM, Harrison McClary wrote: > > > Is this the 2.8 Chris? I just read Erwin Puts review and he > > really likes the ZM 21/2.8. > > > > Wonder how well it works on the M9? > > > > I really am not interested in another slow lens. Never have liked > > them much. I often need faster apertures than f4 or 5.6. I saw a > > 21/1.4 for 5800...tempting but a lot more than I want to spend. > > > > On 11/15/10 12:43 PM, Chris Williams wrote: > >> Love,love,love the Zeiss. > >> > >> > >> Chris Williams > >> www.zoeicaimages.net > >> www.rebirthworkshops.com > >> 504-231-6261 > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Nov 15, 2010, at 11:09 AM, Harrison McClary wrote: > >> > >>> Which 21 should I consider? Is the Zeiss 21 2.8 a good lens? > >>> Is it close to the Elmarit in performance? How does it compare > >>> to the VC 21? I'd prefer having the 2.8 aperture. > >>> > >>> Thanks. > >>> > >>> Harrison. > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Leica Users Group. > >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more > >>> information > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Leica Users Group. > >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more > >> information > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information