Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/11/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Comparison M9, R9
From: images at (Tina Manley)
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 19:49:05 -0400
References: <> <>

Thanks, Jeff.  They were made within 2 minutes of each other with the same
light.  I was surprised that the R9 handled the extreme range better than
the M9.  I just converted them in LR3 with custom profile for the M9 but I
haven't profiled the R9 yet so that's just whatever LR used.  I tried
several ways of adding extra dynamic range for the M9 but none of them
looked any better than the original.  I'll keep playing with them, though.
 I much prefer the R9 version so far.


On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Jeff Moore <jbm at> wrote:

> 2010-11-06-19:06:03 Tina Manley:
> > Here are two shots from today.  One with the M9 and 90 Summicron:
> >
> >
> >
> > and one with the R9, DMR, and 80 Summilux:
> >
> >
> Interesting.  The M9/90 picture looks crispier, for what that's worth,
> but these photos are hard to compare - the M9 picture has harder, more
> direct light while the R picture is more cloud-diffused;  the white
> balances seem different;  it's possible that custom DNG profiles would
> help, if you haven't already done those;  blah, blah, blah.
> For reasons which probably have nothing to do with the equipment used,
> I think I like the R one a bit better.  It seems like raw material
> from which a photo I'd like could be cropped.
>  -Jeff
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See for more information

Tina Manley, ASMP

Replies: Reply from grduprey at (grduprey at ([Leica] Comparison M9, R9)
Reply from benedenia at (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] Comparison M9, R9)
In reply to: Message from images at (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Comparison M9, R9)
Message from jbm at (Jeff Moore) ([Leica] Comparison M9, R9)