Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/10/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I'm so happy out there with my 24-85. Before this full frame two days ago it was a 35-130 Which is an interesting lens but I'm finding the 24-85 much more useful. I think I even had an early AF 35 to 135 and sold it for ten bucks with the rest of the stuff in my house. Normal zooms get bad reps. Can't see why!?!? -------------------- Mark William Rabiner Photography http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ mark at rabinergroup.com Cars: http://tinyurl.com/2f7ptxb > From: Slobodan Dimitrov <s.dimitrov at charter.net> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 19:48:33 -0700 > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Subject: Re: [Leica] Nikon or Canon Full Frame; All Good (Older User's > Perspective) > > I'm not a happy camper. My 20-35mm, f2.8L, finally had to be > scrapped. I'm waiting on word for the 24-70 replacement, though hardly > any rumors floating around at the moment. > I'm missing a decent wide to short tele zoom. > S.d.