Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/10/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] D700
From: benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney)
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 17:30:02 +1030
References: <AANLkTi==1DyE_UJcz1K8wBbVYeKc6J2hnxoNLym_Jqmf@mail.gmail.com> <C8E7DCF0.567F%mark@rabinergroup.com> <AANLkTimjS2d218X6uV83jE4+JZyPWfizocV8dHgKKcFV@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=e1PgkHToFfGhOdCSGcBgxN2_5gZtFkqGuOVHh@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimUS4K=naRQJVi_2aCqRgApVNQ=BVEpbZ_-6OoC@mail.gmail.com> <7df9b9cd519acc1476b3b248b75f8f1b.squirrel@emailmg.globat.com>
 
No, but I tried it out with some Zeiss and Sony Minolta mount lenses.
It was by far the best dSLR I've tried at ISOs under ~1000.  I have
some 30x45 inch prints from it that are astounding.  I liked it better
than the Nikon D3x.  But I only had both for about 2.5 weeks and
2-3000 frames.

Marty




On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 4:46 PM,  <afirkin at afirkin.com> wrote:
>> I was thinking more like a Sony A900 with some Zeiss primes . . .
>> actually . . .
>>
>> Marty
>
> Has anyone tried the Sony especially with re-mounted leica glass? I'm
> tempted, but there are quite a few "downsides" etc to consider.
>
> Cheers
>
> alastair
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
In reply to: Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] D700)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] D700)
Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] D700)
Message from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] D700)
Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] D700)
Message from afirkin at afirkin.com (afirkin at afirkin.com) ([Leica] D700)