Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/10/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] D700
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 00:29:36 -0400
 
>From what I know the 24-120 established a bad rep from day one but was
completely redone a few years later then completely redone again then a few
years later completely redone again with VR. It could be ok by now though I
like zooms which vear on the conservative side. But the 24-120 has VR.
And VR is a not to be an underestimated game changer.

Voucher Recharge
Verification Requirement


--------------------
Mark William Rabiner
Photography
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
mark at rabinergroup.com
Cars:   http://tinyurl.com/2f7ptxb




> From: Marty Deveney <benedenia at gmail.com>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 12:19:10 +1030
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] D700
> 
> I don't like zooms.  The 24-70 2.8 AF-S is decent.  The 24-120 is the
> worst; the real dog of the Nikkor range.
> 
> Just about any wide range zoom is hopeless for architectural work.
> 
> Marty
Replies: Reply from leicaslacker at gmail.com (kyle cassidy on the lug) ([Leica] D700)
Reply from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] D700)
 In reply to: Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] D700)