Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/09/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] D-Lux5 vs DMC-LX5
From: shino at panix.com (Rei Shinozuka)
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 22:20:39 -0400
References: <52F26E12-AC6A-49DD-AC5A-94B83472720C@charter.net>
 
There doesn't seem to be much difference, analogous to the case of 
D-LUX4 vs. DMC-LX3.

Not to beat Mr. Rabiner to the punch, but my opinion is that in 2010, 
$1,000 is too much to pay for a camera with a sensor the size of a 
hanging chad.

-rei



On 09/21/2010 09:02 PM, slobodan Dimitrov wrote:
> The only difference that I can find is that the Leica offering comes with 
> Lightroom, which I already have.
> Anything else?
> S.d.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] D-Lux5 vs. DMC-LX5)
 In reply to: Message from s.dimitrov at charter.net (slobodan Dimitrov) ([Leica] D-Lux5 vs DMC-LX5)