Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/09/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] D-Lux5 vs. DMC-LX5
From: mark at (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 01:32:18 -0400

To me the size of the hanging Chad needs to match the size of the camera.
A sensor size the size of my pinky to me means a camera which goes in my
front jeans pocket and it around the size of a credit card. If that's the
case than to me that camera makes sense for when you want a camera that
Its small formats in big cameras which bug me. The non mini 4/3's.

Mark William Rabiner
mark at

> From: Rei Shinozuka <shino at>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at>
> Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 22:20:39 -0400
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] D-Lux5 vs DMC-LX5
> There doesn't seem to be much difference, analogous to the case of
> D-LUX4 vs. DMC-LX3.
> Not to beat Mr. Rabiner to the punch, but my opinion is that in 2010,
> $1,000 is too much to pay for a camera with a sensor the size of a
> hanging chad.
> -rei
> On 09/21/2010 09:02 PM, slobodan Dimitrov wrote:
>> The only difference that I can find is that the Leica offering comes with
>> Lightroom, which I already have.
>> Anything else?
>> S.d.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See for more information
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See for more information

Replies: Reply from shino at (Rei Shinozuka) ([Leica] IMG: Contax T3 (WAS Re: D-Lux5 vs. DMC-LX5))
In reply to: Message from shino at (Rei Shinozuka) ([Leica] D-Lux5 vs DMC-LX5)