Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/09/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Olympus 50-200 (was Re: (no subject))
From: lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll Querol)
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 21:20:51 +0200
References: <6dfcba4d5bb89631f368bb1fb8f9032a.squirrel@mail.threshinc.com> <F018EB35-C97C-4D04-8BF6-B2EC7505799A@gmail.com>

Jeffery.,

I find this picture, not perfect, but it has a good quality.

Saludos
Lluis

El 15/09/2010, a las 3:02, Jeffery Smith escribi?:

> I shot this at relatively low shutter speed (his mouth is blurred  
> because he was chewing) with the 50-200 Olympus at the far end with  
> the E-1.
>
> http://400tx.com/files/NOLABW/28.html
>
> Jeffery
>
>
> On Sep 14, 2010, at 7:54 PM, Peter Klein wrote:
>
>> I recently visited David Young, who many of you know from the Leica-R
>> list. David does wildlife photography. He's found that his E-3 with  
>> the
>> Olympus 50-200 zoom gave him excellent image quality, and  
>> significantly
>> more magnification per pound of gear carried. That "crop circle"  
>> has an
>> upside--it doubles your effective magnification.
>>
>> David has three large (16x20-ish) prints on his living-room wall.  
>> Could I
>> tell which ones were made with Leica equipment and which were with
>> Olympus?  I couldn't.
>>
>> I can't agree with my friend Mark about the "crop-circle" thing.   
>> It's
>> about suitability for the job at hand, not suitability for  
>> everything.
>> There are some things that are 1Ds Mark-whatever territory, and  
>> somethings
>> that are Leica M territory, and some things that are Olympus  
>> territory.
>>
>> One thing that is true is that the 4/3 DSLRs didn't really give us  
>> the
>> small and light footprint that was initially promised.  That has  
>> fallen to
>> micro 4/3.  And for high-ISO noise, size does matter.
>>
>> --Peter
>>
>> Richard Man wrote:
>>
>>> B.D. still uses E-System, not quite a nobody.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at  
>> rabinergroup.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> You would have thought they'd have paid off some names. They  
>>> usually do.
>>> "they" being most camera companies. These people nobody ever heard  
>>> of. Cept
>>> their Mom's.
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from pklein at threshinc.com (Peter Klein) ([Leica] (no subject))
Message from jsmith342 at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Olympus 50-200 (was Re: (no subject)))