Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/09/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Olympus 50-200 (was Re: (no subject))
From: jsmith342 at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith)
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 21:01:22 -0500
References: <6dfcba4d5bb89631f368bb1fb8f9032a.squirrel@mail.threshinc.com> <F018EB35-C97C-4D04-8BF6-B2EC7505799A@gmail.com> <BCD1022EF3EF47679ADB2F8C0567C22E@jimnichols>

Ric and Jim,

Thanks much for the comments. I was impressed by the E-1's ability to nail 
the eye focus when I wasn't even certain of it. I wasn't expecting that for 
a 400mm (effective) setting using a zoom lens.

Jeffery


On Sep 14, 2010, at 8:54 PM, Jim Nichols wrote:

> And you got a highlight in the eye.  Nice work!
> 
> Jim Nichols
> Tullahoma, TN USA
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeffery Smith" <jsmith342 at gmail.com>
> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 8:02 PM
> Subject: [Leica] Olympus 50-200 (was Re: (no subject))
> 
> 
>> I shot this at relatively low shutter speed (his mouth is blurred because 
>> he was chewing) with the 50-200 Olympus at the far end with the E-1.
>> 
>> http://400tx.com/files/NOLABW/28.html
>> 
>> Jeffery
>> 
>> 
>> On Sep 14, 2010, at 7:54 PM, Peter Klein wrote:
>> 
>>> I recently visited David Young, who many of you know from the Leica-R
>>> list. David does wildlife photography. He's found that his E-3 with the
>>> Olympus 50-200 zoom gave him excellent image quality, and significantly
>>> more magnification per pound of gear carried. That "crop circle" has an
>>> upside--it doubles your effective magnification.
>>> 
>>> David has three large (16x20-ish) prints on his living-room wall. Could I
>>> tell which ones were made with Leica equipment and which were with
>>> Olympus?  I couldn't.
>>> 
>>> I can't agree with my friend Mark about the "crop-circle" thing.  It's
>>> about suitability for the job at hand, not suitability for everything.
>>> There are some things that are 1Ds Mark-whatever territory, and 
>>> somethings
>>> that are Leica M territory, and some things that are Olympus territory.
>>> 
>>> One thing that is true is that the 4/3 DSLRs didn't really give us the
>>> small and light footprint that was initially promised.  That has fallen 
>>> to
>>> micro 4/3.  And for high-ISO noise, size does matter.
>>> 
>>> --Peter
>>> 
>>> Richard Man wrote:
>>> 
>>>> B.D. still uses E-System, not quite a nobody.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> You would have thought they'd have paid off some names. They usually do.
>>>> "they" being most camera companies. These people nobody ever heard of. 
>>>> Cept
>>>> their Mom's.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from pklein at threshinc.com (Peter Klein) ([Leica] (no subject))
Message from jsmith342 at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Olympus 50-200 (was Re: (no subject)))
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] Olympus 50-200 (was Re: (no subject)))