Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/07/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I agree with you that over 400, the image (on a DLUX4) isn't pretty. Unfortunately, the sample 1600 ISO images shown as part of the LX5 review look pretty unpleasant to me, noisy, artifacty and overprocessed all at the same time. If there's an improvement over LX3/DLUX4, it's not jumping out at me. -rei On 08/01/2010 12:05 AM, H. Ball Arche wrote: > "At first glance the LX5 looks like an LX3/DLUX4 with a 90mm (35mm eq) > long end > and the ability to mount the EVF from the Lumix GF1." > > > > > Not to mention the additional two stops of (possibly) usable ISO; the LX3 > being > unreliable above 400. Watch for the NEX 7. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >