[Leica] AA or Uncle Earl?

[hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson)]

I'm not surprised that the provenance is disputed. Actually I expected that,
if they were accepted to be Ansel Adams' work there may be an ownership
dispute. If the claims were true (and I have no clue of course) the
originals allegedly destroyed by fire with many others would still belong to
the creator (or rather his estate arrangements) in my view.

Now the question is will original work claimed to be by uncle Earl fetch the
same prices???? ;-)

Cheers
Geoff
http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman


On 30 July 2010 08:50, Ken Carney <kcarney1 at cox.net> wrote:

> In case you haven't seen this:
>
> http://www.ktvu.com/news/24432262/detail.html
>
> Ken Carney
> Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>