Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/07/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] AA or Uncle Earl?
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:41:15 -0500
References: <4C5205C3.8070403@cox.net> <AANLkTikeqhRKFyfBri_k0OGesJQXAx=WWv9kW9spxYAJ@mail.gmail.com>
 
Uncle Earl will be promoted as the Grandma Moses of photography
and fetch a tidy sum - but not the astronomical prices of 
"?long lost early Adams glass plates."

quite a hoot to watch unfold

;~)

Regards,
George Lottermoser 
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist





On Jul 29, 2010, at 6:15 PM, Geoff Hopkinson wrote:

> Now the question is will original work claimed to be by uncle Earl fetch 
> the
> same prices???? ;-)
Replies: Reply from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] AA or Uncle Earl?)
 In reply to: Message from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] AA or Uncle Earl?)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] AA or Uncle Earl?)