Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/07/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M8 firmware 2.005
From: lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll Querol)
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 14:47:00 +0200
References: <7304235.1278682145969.JavaMail.root@elwamui-polski.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <4C384565.9000304@hale-pohaku.com> <BCF53237-7716-4340-888A-F62975447B15@frozenlight.eu>

Too late Nathan!

I've already updated my firmware...

Saludos
Lluis

El 10/07/2010, a las 13:40, Nathan Wajsman escribi?:

> Firmware, blah. Here is exciting product development news, announced  
> by Leica on Facebook recently:
>
> Leica sera pr?sent au Mans Classic du 9 au 11 juillet 2010. 450  
> voitures n?es de 1923 ? 1979 s?affronteront sur ce circuit  
> l?gendaire, et plus de 8.000 v?hicules viendront du monde entier  
> pour cette concentration, admir?es par plus de 120.000 spectateurs?  
> Leica y tient une boutique dans l?espace Village et vendra une s?rie  
> limit?e ? 50 exemplaires du Leica X1 avec un ?tui marron patin?.
>
> For some reason they posted it in French, probably since they are  
> hyping their presence at an event in Le Mans. That X1 in a special  
> case must take pictures vastly superior to the run-of-the-mill  
> cameras...
>
> Nathan
>
> Nathan Wajsman
> Alicante, Spain
> http://www.frozenlight.eu
> http://www.greatpix.eu
> http://www.nathanfoto.com
> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
> Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
>
> YNWA
>
>
>
>
>
> On Jul 10, 2010, at 12:03 PM, Dennis wrote:
>
>> Hi Frank,
>>
>> I think this is a good idea.  Charging for upgrade firmware is a  
>> reasonable support solution for Leica. In the past Leica has  
>> provided custom upgrades to bodies on an individual basis and I see  
>> firmware as no different. Of course the upgrade is not customized  
>> to an individual's  specification but designed to provide a  
>> functionality with broad appeal. This is somewhat  akin to adding  
>> slow shutter speeds to the II series Leicas thus upgrading them to  
>> the III series.Not to mention finder upgrades for M series.
>>
>> In order to ensure each upgrade is paid a buyer should receive  
>> firmware that it tied to their camera's serial number. Nothing is  
>> unbreakable but by using encryption it can be made difficult enough  
>> that typical buyer is not going to be able to give away, or use,  
>> copies on other cameras.
>>
>> I took  a look at the M8 2.005 firmware file, m8-2_005.upd, and  
>> it's 4,899 KB, sort of an odd number. If it's a complete image then  
>> it implies about 4MB of flash in the camera. If incomplete, i.e.  
>> unused memory space not filled, then the flash could be quite a bit  
>> more.
>>
>> As to making your camera a doorstop by installing a bad firmware  
>> it's unlikely as most firmware designs will have a firmware loader  
>> in flash that is not overwritten when installing firmware.
>>
>> It's not uncommon for manufacturers to disallow downleveling, i.e.  
>> installing an older level of firmware. No doubt there is a way to  
>> downlevel, but only the manufacturer, and hackers, will know how to  
>> do this.
>>
>> It's my impression that most camera firmware hacks are simply  
>> turning on features that already exist in the firmware. These hacks  
>> do not require detail knowledge of the hardware nor significant  
>> reverse engineering of firmware.
>>
>> I am sure that Leica learned a lot with the M8 firmware and made a  
>> decision to improve the design for the M9, make it more modular,  
>> easier to maintain, etc. Good firmware is expensive and I  hope  
>> Leica has made the M9 firmware modular and abstracted hardware  
>> detail such that it's a solid base for future digital M cameras.
>>
>> Dennis
>>
>>
>>
>> red735i at earthlink.net wrote:
>>> The orginal statement on M8 having a lens menu like the  M9....had  
>>> it as not possible......
>>> Not possible and too $$$ are totally different things.....
>>>
>>> One is a management decision not to supprt your customer base, the  
>>> other is a technical evaluation of feasibility.
>>>
>>> I do not understand why this kind of FW could not be a chargeable  
>>> fee....  If they can get $175 for a $16 battery, why not $100-300  
>>> for a FW update with some meat in it?  Say a few thousand folk did  
>>> the update at $300 each, that would pay for the SW inveestment...  
>>> the code is already written  ( for the M9), it just need to be put  
>>> into the M8 space, and then tested.  It is not that expensive to  
>>> do this....
>>>
>>> Your fears over FW hacking..... Both the M8 and M9 code is  
>>> accessible.... and comparisons can be made.
>>> BUT, successful hacking is not done by amateurs, but by people  
>>> that write code for a living.
>>> I am not suggesting that some Physicican/Lawyer/Indian Chief  
>>> decide to hack code on his M8.....
>>>
>>> Frank
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Leica Camera said that it would be too expensive to implement  
>>>> after the fact
>>>> and was only possible with the M9 due to writing the new firmware  
>>>> from
>>>> scratch.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from red735i at earthlink.net (red735i at earthlink.net) ([Leica] M8 firmware 2.005)
Message from dennis at hale-pohaku.com (Dennis) ([Leica] M8 firmware 2.005)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] M8 firmware 2.005)