Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/05/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 200mm test
From: digiratidoc at gmail.com (James Laird)
Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 09:37:25 -0500
References: <AANLkTilbK3EnpzZp0JIe6iqUaRXlVB-0X98U7g5duwLo@mail.gmail.com>

Vince,

Don't you just LOVE this little lens? I think it's one of the best  
carry telephotos I've ever used, although I don't have the Leica 180  
Doug mentioned but I'll bet anything it's a lot heavier than the  
Nikkor. And yes I use it mostly on the Telyt shoulder stock. Makes for  
MUCH steadier shooting IMHO. Have fun!

Jim Laird

Sent from my iPhone

On May 16, 2010, at 12:16 AM, Vince Passaro <passaro.vince at gmail.com>  
wrote:

> Dr. Ted I know you're out there -- a savage hound on the dark moor  
> -- but I
> want to ask all you others, do you remember a discussion thread  
> about a
> month or so back on the Nikon 200 f/4 prime? As I recollect Jim  
> Laird (?)
> was constructing a shoulder brace for use with this lens. Doug  
> advised him.
> Several others kibbutzed, including me, to the effect that the lens  
> is quite
> light.  Well today it was so lovely I was testing my 200mm lenses  
> out the
> front window. We live up the hill from a park with a big pond in it  
> and the
> living room overlooks it. Tested Nikkor AF 70-210 1:4-5.6 D;  Nikkor  
> 80-200
> 1:4.5 AI-S ; and the Nikkor 200 1:4 AI-S as previously mentioned.   
> All at
> F8.  RAW. ISO 400 because I was too dumb to remember to change it  
> and since
> I used to shoot Tri-X almost exclusively I tend to leave it at 400  
> most of
> the time and not think about it. Roughly 1/500th of a second though  
> this
> varied a little because the metering on the D40x is a little too  
> bright so
> with the AF-D lens -- the only one with which the D40 can provide  
> metering
> and aperture priority -- one keeps the EV adjusted to -.7.
>
> I swear to God Dr. Ted I was thinking about Leicas the whole time. I  
> was
> thinking about selling the new kid -- he was right there with me and  
> damn
> cute -- so I could put a down payment on an M9.
>
> Anyway the 200/4 knocked my socks off.  Here are three images from  
> one shot:
> The first just a JPEG straight up from the RAW file. The second  
> cropped and
> enlarged almost to 100 percent and slightly adjusted in PS Camera  
> Raw. The
> third cropped the same but with more work fixing the highlights,  
> working out
> a bit of fringing, color adjustment, sharpening, etc.
>
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/toast+eatin_+bog+man/nikon+200mm+f4/
>
> Opinions, criticisms and advice most welcome. Particularly welcome  
> is advice
> on the processing. Everything I know how to do is in camera raw. I  
> have
> hardly tried PS itself yet.
>
> Vince
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro) ([Leica] 200mm test)