Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/05/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] 200mm test
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 11:37:33 -0500
References: <AANLkTilbK3EnpzZp0JIe6iqUaRXlVB-0X98U7g5duwLo@mail.gmail.com>
 
What, about these image samples, "knocked [your] socks off"?
I don't see any thing at all special.
What should I be looking at (for)?

Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist

On May 16, 2010, at 12:16 AM, Vince Passaro wrote:

> Anyway the 200/4 knocked my socks off.
Replies: Reply from passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro) ([Leica] 200mm test)
 In reply to: Message from passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro) ([Leica] 200mm test)