Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Exposure comp and the M9
From: images at comporium.net (Tina Manley)
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:43:27 -0400
References: <mailman.1117.1272465035.89760.lug@leica-users.org> <4BD85A16.2050503@verizon.net>

I used to underexpose by 1/3 and sometimes 2/3 stop.  But I no longer do
that.  LR3 is so good at recovering highlights that I don't worry about it
anymore and I think the files are better exposed correctly.

Tina

On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Stan Yoder <s.yoder at verizon.net> wrote:

> The conventional wisdom with the M8 (which I followed) was to underexpose a
> bit to make sure highlights weren't blown, then resurrect shadow detail in
> post. Also, some felt that underexposing at high ISOs kept the noise down.
>
> So, to those of you with M9s, are you continuing to do that for either or
> both reasons (assuming you did so with your M8s)? Or do you no longer find
> it useful or necessary?
>
> TIA,
> Stan Yoder
>
> BTW, great to meet some of you at the Savannah LHSA shoot.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>


-- 
Tina Manley, ASMP
www.tinamanley.com


Replies: Reply from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Exposure comp and the M9)
In reply to: Message from s.yoder at verizon.net (Stan Yoder) ([Leica] Exposure comp and the M9)