Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG:Tripping the Light Fantastic, 21'lux at F1.4
From: richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man)
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 00:50:33 -0700
References: <i2xeb6799211004161323g3714ecb0j9cd514e95478d48d@mail.gmail.com> <C483C4A3-185A-4E87-A781-5106B45242F8@frozenlight.eu> <u2xeb6799211004162340ne444c3d0sd7f01513d4e7c8f@mail.gmail.com> <p2pee8fa51c1004162344yaf05c799y39304035b69d8c39@mail.gmail.com> <m2u36172e5a1004170033p41ce9d6asfa6bac7bc1e16ee3@mail.gmail.com>

True.... I have no idea the exact causes for the purple fringe but they are:

http://www.5pmlight.com/PICS/Wright/L9995226-2.jpg

It's... hey, look it's 5 PM light :-)

Anyway, mostly overcast.

I am liking the 21POV a lot. I can see why Eugene Richards and Jeanloup
Sieff like it so much (not that I can be mentioned in the same city as
them).

On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 12:33 AM, Geoff Hopkinson <hopsternew at 
gmail.com>wrote:

> Richard I think that it is a mistake to assume that fringing you have seen
> in some circumstances is necessarily a limitation of the optical properties
> of the lens. There are other factors that can cause or exacerbate
> 'fringing'
> in digital images also. I could detect this effect in only 2 from fifty or
> so exposures I made with one and that was in fine detail, adverse light and
> on the at extreme edges wide open (with M8). Here's an uncropped sample
> reproduced a little larger than normal for you, since pictures are better
> than opinions ;-)
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/hoppyman/2/21Lux.jpg.html
> For what it's worth, I'm with Marty and consider my 24 to be a more useful
> and pleasing lens on my M9. I went for slower and more compact though. It
> all depends on what you want to shoot with it naturally.
>  Cheers
> Geoff
> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman
>
>
> On 17 April 2010 16:44, Marty Deveney <benedenia at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Yes, and the 24 has a lot less distortion if you are willing or able
> > to take a half a step back.
> >
> > Marty
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Richard Man <richard at imagecraft.com>
> > wrote:
> > > They have to make compromises. Even the wizards of Solms cannot do
> magic
> > > beyond certain points. It has horrible purple fringing around tree
> > branches
> > > and the distortion makes it not too useful for full on architectural
> > work.
> > > But then again, this is why Leica makes the Super Angulon and the other
> > 21,
> > > heck, even Zeiss makes a very good one :-) This is a lens made for low
> > light
> > > shooting...
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Nathan Wajsman <photo at 
> > > frozenlight.eu
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> That's a surprising amount of distortion for a Leica lens--but an
> > >> impressive piece of glass nonetheless.
> > >>
> > >> Cheers,
> > >> Nathan
> > >>
> > >> Nathan Wajsman
> > >> Alicante, Spain
> > >> http://www.frozenlight.eu
> > >> http://www.greatpix.eu
> > >> http://www.nathanfoto.com
> > >>
> > >> Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
> > >> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
> > >> Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Apr 16, 2010, at 10:23 PM, Richard Man wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > This lens has more distortion than the Super Angulon and about 4
> times
> > >> the
> > >> > size, but if you want to shoot at 1.4, what choice is there?
> > >> > http://www.5pmlight.com/PICS/L9995407.jpg
> > >> >
> > >> > BTW, all but one photos from previous link are shot with this lens
> as
> > >> well.
> > >> > http://www.5pmlight.com/PICS/tmp/SFMOMA-people/
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > // richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/>
> > >> > // icc blog: <http://imagecraft.wordpress.com>
> > >> > // photo blog: <http://www.5pmlight.com>
> > >> > [ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all
> > >> previous
> > >> > replies in your msgs. ]
> > >> >
> > >> > _______________________________________________
> > >> > Leica Users Group.
> > >> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more
> information
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Leica Users Group.
> > >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > // richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/>
> > > // icc blog: <http://imagecraft.wordpress.com>
> > > // photo blog: <http://www.5pmlight.com>
> > > [ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all
> > previous
> > > replies in your msgs. ]
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Leica Users Group.
> > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
// richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/>
// icc blog: <http://imagecraft.wordpress.com>
// photo blog: <http://www.5pmlight.com>
[ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all previous
replies in your msgs. ]


In reply to: Message from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] IMG:Tripping the Light Fantastic, 21'lux at F1.4)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] IMG:Tripping the Light Fantastic, 21'lux at F1.4)
Message from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] IMG:Tripping the Light Fantastic, 21'lux at F1.4)
Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] IMG:Tripping the Light Fantastic, 21'lux at F1.4)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] IMG:Tripping the Light Fantastic, 21'lux at F1.4)