Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Why Micro-4-3rds?
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 07:04:10 +0200
References: <C7ED54FD.6158A%mark@rabinergroup.com>

I really like it how someone who has no personal experience with either the 
M8 or the MFT cameras makes a living on this mailing list constantly 
trashing them.

Meanwhile, the rest of us are happily taking pictures.

Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com

Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog






On Apr 16, 2010, at 5:42 AM, Mark Rabiner wrote:

>> Micro-4/3rds cameras are certainly serious cameras, it's just a question 
>> of
>> what your needs or desires are.  If I were a professional and needed to
>> satisfy editors who demanded full-frame quality, I'd have full-frame 
>> camera,
>> too.  
>> 
>> Regards, 
>> 
>> Dick
>> 
> 
> 
> A Leica M6 is a serous camera. Most of Magnum was using them.
> A micro 4/3's I bet some of them have in the bottom of their camera bags.
> So they can shoot each other when they get drunk in bars.
> A micro 4/3 should not be motioned in the same breath as the Leica M 
> system.
> Or pro DSLRS.
> 
> 
> 
> [Rabs]
> Mark William Rabiner
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Why Micro-4-3rds?)