Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Yea but my point was neither the GF1 or EP-1/2 has an optical viewfinder either. Slap that 20/1.7 Panasonic onto a G1 and you've got a relatively compact package that can use a huge variety of lenses and has a great 'electronic' viewfinder. And it also shoots RAW (and comes with SILKYPIX, a great RAW converter so you don't have to buy Photoshop). Jim On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Robert Meier <robertmeier at usjet.net> wrote: > No optical vf, > > On Apr 8, 2010, at 10:16 PM, slobodan Dimitrov wrote: > >> Canon S90 is. >> It also shoots in RAW. >> S.d. >> >> >> On Apr 8, 2010, at 8:07 PM, Lawrence Zeitlin wrote: >> >>> My wife calls me an adventitious photographer. She says I don't compose, >>> I >>> just shoot. >>> >>> >>> For the last 50 years I've carried a camera with me most of the time and >>> react almost instantly to a photo op. The camera has to be pocket sized >>> so >>> that it won't interfere with whatever else I am doing. For years it was >>> an >>> old Leica IIIc with a 35 mm f2.8 Canon lens or a 50 mm Elmar that could >>> fit >>> into the side pocket of a windbreaker. When I traveled it was usually a >>> Rollei 35 in a small belt holster. I even carried a Minox when I wore a >>> suit >>> and tie. True, I owned bigger and more professional equipment which I >>> used >>> when I had to take serious pictures but they were usually too bulky to >>> carry >>> everyday. But for a variety of reasons I gave up my wet darkroom and my >>> film >>> cameras became too inconvenient to use. Now I carry a wafer thin Canon >>> SD1200IS. It has a 10 MP sensor and is smaller and lighter than any of >>> the >>> others (except the Minox). >>> >>> >>> The big problem is that when I post pictures to the LUG, I can see >>> obvious >>> quality differences between my pocket cameras and the M8 and M9 Leicas >>> and >>> DSLRs that most Luggers use. What I would like is suggestions for a carry >>> digital camera that will close the gap. I don't expect M9 quality but I >>> don't want to be embarrassed either. My criteria are the the camera has >>> to >>> be smaller and much lighter than a Barnack Leica and have an optical >>> viewfinder. The optical finder is necessary because I wear bifocals and >>> have >>> to bob my head up and down like a pigeon when using a LCD camera screen. >>> I'm >>> not sure if any of the new 4/3 cameras will fill the bill but I'm not >>> opposed to the format. I own an Olympus DSLR and I find it more than >>> adequate. The problem is that I live more than 50 miles from any large >>> camera store and I don't get to see and handle any of the newer compact >>> cameras. >>> >>> >>> Can any Lugger offer suggestions for a good carry camera? >>> >>> >>> Larry Z >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >