Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]My wife calls me an adventitious photographer. She says I don't compose, I just shoot. For the last 50 years I've carried a camera with me most of the time and react almost instantly to a photo op. The camera has to be pocket sized so that it won't interfere with whatever else I am doing. For years it was an old Leica IIIc with a 35 mm f2.8 Canon lens or a 50 mm Elmar that could fit into the side pocket of a windbreaker. When I traveled it was usually a Rollei 35 in a small belt holster. I even carried a Minox when I wore a suit and tie. True, I owned bigger and more professional equipment which I used when I had to take serious pictures but they were usually too bulky to carry everyday. But for a variety of reasons I gave up my wet darkroom and my film cameras became too inconvenient to use. Now I carry a wafer thin Canon SD1200IS. It has a 10 MP sensor and is smaller and lighter than any of the others (except the Minox). The big problem is that when I post pictures to the LUG, I can see obvious quality differences between my pocket cameras and the M8 and M9 Leicas and DSLRs that most Luggers use. What I would like is suggestions for a carry digital camera that will close the gap. I don't expect M9 quality but I don't want to be embarrassed either. My criteria are the the camera has to be smaller and much lighter than a Barnack Leica and have an optical viewfinder. The optical finder is necessary because I wear bifocals and have to bob my head up and down like a pigeon when using a LCD camera screen. I'm not sure if any of the new 4/3 cameras will fill the bill but I'm not opposed to the format. I own an Olympus DSLR and I find it more than adequate. The problem is that I live more than 50 miles from any large camera store and I don't get to see and handle any of the newer compact cameras. Can any Lugger offer suggestions for a good carry camera? Larry Z