Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Demise of film
From: pasvorn at boonmark.net (Pasvorn Boonmark)
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 14:55:14 -0700
References: <k2r6a7544a61004010830h591711e6ve591498deaec0bfa@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20100401142146.035ef030@med.cornell.edu>

Chris,

Great story.

Sadly, I can not name a "Efficient company town", well Mountain View for
Google, may be. :)

-Pasvorn

On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Chris Saganich <chs2018 at 
med.cornell.edu>wrote:

>
> Eastman set-up that town for failure early on.  Before Eastman put the
> screws to the place Rochester was one of the most successful and creative
> cities in the North East regarding technology.  That's the reason Eastman
> set up shop there because of the already highly advanced work in precision
> manufacturing and  optical work.  Eastman came to complete dominate the
> Rochester economy choking off or swallowing up nearly every other business
> in town.  Xerox, named Haloid at the time was a photo supply operation and
> survived the Eastman onslaught because they were so small as to go
> unnoticed.  They bought the rights to a process invented by a clerk in an
> electrical machine patten office to copy diagrams for patten research and
> then developed photo-copy paper and machines to use the process.  By that
> time Rochester was already a efficient company town and Xerox despite its
> innovative spirit couldn't return Rochester to its pre-Kodak dynamic
> economy.  Efficient company towns are destined to stagnate and fail so if
> your living in one get-out while you can and don't look back!
>
> Chris
>
>
>
>


Replies: Reply from chs2018 at med.cornell.edu (Chris Saganich) ([Leica] Demise of film)
In reply to: Message from lrzeitlin at gmail.com (Lawrence Zeitlin) ([Leica] Demise of film)
Message from chs2018 at med.cornell.edu (Chris Saganich) ([Leica] Demise of film)