Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Chris, Great story. Sadly, I can not name a "Efficient company town", well Mountain View for Google, may be. :) -Pasvorn On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Chris Saganich <chs2018 at med.cornell.edu>wrote: > > Eastman set-up that town for failure early on. Before Eastman put the > screws to the place Rochester was one of the most successful and creative > cities in the North East regarding technology. That's the reason Eastman > set up shop there because of the already highly advanced work in precision > manufacturing and optical work. Eastman came to complete dominate the > Rochester economy choking off or swallowing up nearly every other business > in town. Xerox, named Haloid at the time was a photo supply operation and > survived the Eastman onslaught because they were so small as to go > unnoticed. They bought the rights to a process invented by a clerk in an > electrical machine patten office to copy diagrams for patten research and > then developed photo-copy paper and machines to use the process. By that > time Rochester was already a efficient company town and Xerox despite its > innovative spirit couldn't return Rochester to its pre-Kodak dynamic > economy. Efficient company towns are destined to stagnate and fail so if > your living in one get-out while you can and don't look back! > > Chris > > > >