Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT: Another maybe not so stupid GH1 question
From: passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro)
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 04:13:48 -0400
References: <daaeb97e1003251901x39685bb5w60bb366bf9ca4089@mail.gmail.com> <20100326023230.GS29479@jbm.org> <daaeb97e1003252002v1a389887kaeb0c063c1ae551e@mail.gmail.com> <a3f189161003252005y54471dadm7a899184f4656a8@mail.gmail.com> <daaeb97e1003252014q462910c5yefac14166cf0ae48@mail.gmail.com> <a3f189161003252054y79906939o1a220e432c04a26c@mail.gmail.com> <19b6d42d1003252129t4f187030h3c55760ac01e99b@mail.gmail.com> <eb6799211003252204n6fb843fblb96565e0931ad77a@mail.gmail.com> <19b6d42d1003260030r45049a51rd16732edcf098182@mail.gmail.com> <eb6799211003260055o19325a60jb7267d251309394b@mail.gmail.com>

That's what I thought you meant. But ain't that DofF?

I'm going to make a pronouncement now: nobody really understands this crop
factor thing in a rational way: some of us (not I, but others, among you
guys) know from practice how a 35mm lens will look on a full frame M9 versus
a 1.3 M8 versus a 1.5 Nikon versus a 2X G series, but no one can explain
it.  The fabulous and popular new 20/1.7 for all you G-sters is a good
starting point. I look up and see new postings from the lens every day. And
the images don't look like 20mm images and they don't look like 40mm images
either, except when they've been cropped even further on PS or LR.

On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 3:55 AM, Richard Man <richard at imagecraft.com> 
wrote:

> Perspective as in .... the vanishing point!!
>
> e.g. if you take a photo of a person with a building way behind them. On a
> 40mm perspective, the building will appear one size, but a 20mm perspective
> will (I'm pretty sure) make the building look smaller.
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:30 AM, Vince Passaro <passaro.vince at gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Richard: I understand "closeness" and "frame" and DofF here, but I don't
> > know what you mean by "perspective" in this case. Can you explain the
> > perspective part?
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 1:04 AM, Richard Man <richard at imagecraft.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Vince, try this:
> > >
> > > You are getting a ~40mm closeness, e.g. if you want to frame a
> headshot,
> > > you
> > > will end up ~where you would be if you are using a 40mm lens on a 35mm
> > > camera, but the perspective (and DoF) would still be 20mm. Hence the
> look
> > > is
> > > not quite like straight 40mm on a 35mm camera.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
>
>
>
> --
> // richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/> blog: <
> http://imagecraft.wordpress.com>
> // portfolio: <http://www.imagecraft.com/pub/PICS/AnotherCalifornia2>
> // mailing lists: <http://www.imagecraft.com/contact.html>
> [ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all previous
> replies in your msgs. ]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] OT: Another maybe not so stupid GH1 question)
Reply from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] OT: Another maybe not so stupid GH1 question)
In reply to: Message from digiratidoc at gmail.com (James Laird) ([Leica] OT: Another maybe not so stupid GH1 question)
Message from jbm at jbm.org (Jeff Moore) ([Leica] OT: Another maybe not so stupid GH1 question)
Message from digiratidoc at gmail.com (James Laird) ([Leica] OT: Another maybe not so stupid GH1 question)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] OT: Another maybe not so stupid GH1 question)
Message from digiratidoc at gmail.com (James Laird) ([Leica] OT: Another maybe not so stupid GH1 question)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] OT: Another maybe not so stupid GH1 question)
Message from passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro) ([Leica] OT: Another maybe not so stupid GH1 question)
Message from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] OT: Another maybe not so stupid GH1 question)
Message from passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro) ([Leica] OT: Another maybe not so stupid GH1 question)
Message from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] OT: Another maybe not so stupid GH1 question)