Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] VF sizes
From: thurmanphoto at gmail.com (Wendy Thurman)
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:53:07 +0500
References: <mailman.855.1268285013.1001.lug@leica-users.org> <A76884FC9D914B5698BACB80B942BA84@SueHome> <36172e5a1003112324l3143ce54k7cb29d929fda172d@mail.gmail.com> <D3B4DFAE-E527-470E-B982-CB4397292A41@btinternet.com> <f681deda1003120836v545bf6a3w5635bd9cde87e4a1@mail.gmail.com> <38AFC11F-3885-4C8E-A91A-369C5330D6BB@btinternet.com>

I hear Sherry K can switch my finder out for less than a King's ransom.  The
.85 M6 finder is flare-central if the light is not right and I need to look
into a cure.

Wendy

On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 9:44 PM, Frank Dernie
<Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com>wrote:

> Hi Wendy, I am sure the M3 finder was the best of the M finders. The M2
> finder was a cheaper version since the M3 was much more complicated to 
> make.
> Low and behold lots of people liked the cheaper finder since it allowed use
> of a 35mm lens without a finder or goggles, they haven't been back to the
> expensive one since...
> all the best,
> Frank
>
> On 12 Mar, 2010, at 16:36, Wendy Thurman wrote:
>
> > n a Leica note, Hugh's M3 certainly has a better, brighter, and easier to
> > focus finder than does my .85 M6.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] VF sizes)
In reply to: Message from bs.pearce at cox.net (Sue Pearce) ([Leica] VF sizes)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] VF sizes)
Message from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] VF sizes)
Message from thurmanphoto at gmail.com (Wendy Thurman) ([Leica] VF sizes)
Message from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] VF sizes)