Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Apparently it can be worth less than a larger pixel (up to a point yet to be determined) ;~) For the moment I'm putting my money on the 6 - 6.8 pixels on a CCD 'cause that's what the "big" boys use (and what's in my M8 and DMR) (even though my 5D sports 8.2 on its Cmos) ;~) Regards, George Lottermoser george at imagist.com http://www.imagist.com http://www.imagist.com/blog http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist On Mar 2, 2010, at 11:58 AM, Jim Nichols wrote: > I looked at two sources. Both said 5.49, for what that is worth. > > Jim Nichols > Tullahoma, TN USA > ----- Original Message ----- From: "George Lottermoser" > <imagist3 at mac.com> > To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org> > Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 11:54 AM > Subject: Re: [Leica] PIXEL PITCH SIZE > > >> the two numbers came from two different sources. >> I'm not sure which one is correct? >> Just wasn't interested enough to track it down. >> >> Regards, >> George Lottermoser >> george at imagist.com >> http://www.imagist.com >> http://www.imagist.com/blog >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist >> >> On Mar 2, 2010, at 11:49 AM, Mark Rabiner wrote: >> >>> It cold be when they use two numbers like that >>> 5.49 - 5.54 size pixel >>> There is something else going on. Maybe you're supposed to multiply >>> them?!?!? >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information