Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] PIXEL PITCH SIZE
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:54:43 -0600
References: <C7B2B9C2.5E8DC%mark@rabinergroup.com>
 
the two numbers came from two different sources.
I'm not sure which one is correct?
Just wasn't interested enough to track it down.

Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist

On Mar 2, 2010, at 11:49 AM, Mark Rabiner wrote:

> It cold be when they use two numbers like that
>  5.49 - 5.54 size pixel
> There is something else going on. Maybe you're supposed to multiply
> them?!?!?
Replies: Reply from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] PIXEL PITCH SIZE)
 In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] PIXEL PITCH SIZE)