Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/02/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] PIXEL PITCH SIZE
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 15:49:17 -0600
References: <C7B04B5C.5E690%mark@rabinergroup.com>

My point was:
it seems that the top of the line medium format sensors like
the CFV 39 which has a 6.8 ?m
or
the PhaseOne P45+ has a 6.8
the Leica S2 has 6.0
etc.
have CCD's with small size pixels

So the trend for high end camera sensors
seems to be CCD with these specs.

I continue to believe that one chooses either
fine detail and high dynamic range
or
high ISO performance.

Of course this could change as technology continues to evolve.

Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist

On Feb 28, 2010, at 3:33 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote:

>> Does anyone have any data
>> if this is true for CCD sensors?
>>
>> It appears to me that CCD's simply do not offer
>> the kind of high ISO performance that Cmos does.
>>
>> As far as I can tell
>> the current (so called) medium format CCD sensors
>> run about the the same sized sensor sites
>> as the M9.
>>
>> Regards,
>> George Lottermoser
>> george at imagist.com
>> http://www.imagist.com
>> http://www.imagist.com/blog
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>>
>> On Feb 28, 2010, at 1:30 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote:
>>
>>> And I'd not mind it if by then the sensor sites had been enlarged
>>> so I'm not
>>> getting 18 MP's but 12 and have a much higher useable iso range. As
>>> is par
>>> for the course right now.
>>
>
>
> Not talking CMOS vs. CCD my PhD didn't cover that.
> I'm pitching the idea of PIXEL PITCH SIZE.
> 6.8 x 6.8 ?m pixel pitch  on the M9.
> The D700 I just checked as an idea to figure out what's going on  
> and its got
> an  8.45-micron pixel pitch. That sounds more like it.
> Hence usably very high low noise ISO's which has become a standard  
> for this
> day and age.
> I have a feeling a size around that is what I'm aiming for for my M9R!
>
> Search engine: pixel pitch size
>
>
> [Rabs]
> Mark William Rabiner
>
> Check out what "Clark" says
> http://www.clarkvision.com/imagedetail/does.pixel.size.matter/
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] PIXEL PITCH SIZE)