Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/02/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Edit, II
From: steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour)
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:09:01 -0800
References: <30db39f21002150919k41147b55v5318c73fd656a3ab@mail.gmail.com> <C79EEE89.5D92A%mark@rabinergroup.com> <73301d6b1002151040i2e4016dy620dffbf1073cb18@mail.gmail.com>

On Feb 15, 2010, at 10:40 AM, Tina Manley wrote:

> Thanks, Mark.  I definitely need the second pair of eyes, or even third and
> fourth.  So many of the ones Maggie put in the A pile would have been in my
> C pile.  I guess it's true that we are our own worst editors. (I am,
> anyway!)

the problem is that it's unfair to conclude that you are a worse editor...

one of you is, or NOT...


Steve


> 
> Tina
> 
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at 
> rabinergroup.com>wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Or much later when we are going over the shots. Or when we do this with 
>> the
>> help of a second pair of eyes.
>> Its not what you shoot that counts its what we show them.
>> 
>> 
>> [Rabs]
>> Mark William Rabiner
>> 
>> 
>> 
> -- 
> Tina Manley, ASMP
> www.tinamanley.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from rbaron at concentric.net (Robert D. Baron) ([Leica] Edit, II)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Edit, II)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Edit, II)