Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/01/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] National Archives bans photography of constitution
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:04:40 +0100
References: <a3f189161001251257q2196677bxe6994c325f252156@mail.gmail.com>

Well, if idiots use flash despite signs banning it, then I can understand 
the policy change.

Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com

Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog



On Jan 25, 2010, at 9:57 PM, Sonny Carter wrote:

> Among other things
> 
> http://voices.washingtonpost.com/federal-eye/2010/01/national_archives_bans_photos.html?hpid=dynamiclead
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> 
> Sonny
> http://www.sonc.com
> http://sonc.stumbleupon.com/
> Natchitoches, Louisiana
> (+31.754164,-093.099080)
> 
> USA
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



In reply to: Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] National Archives bans photography of constitution)