Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/01/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] LA Review
From: richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man)
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 20:16:35 -0800
References: <7ac27f4f1001161959k5d6beae2i2123f3a8e50840c1@mail.gmail.com> <FDDE931A-803F-44A2-8D3E-5435E9CF3965@charter.net> <7ac27f4f1001162016u3e383f40y9148ebaedf5786c6@mail.gmail.com>
 
Only if you use circles and other editing marks :-)

On Jan 16, 2010 8:08 PM, "slobodan Dimitrov" <s.dimitrov at charter.net> 
wrote:

I don't know about the red ink suggestion. It's usually used for student
work.
 S.d.

On Jan 16, 2010, at 7:59 PM, Richard Man wrote: > Anyway, the first reviewer
today, after seeing ...
_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
In reply to: Message from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] LA Review)
Message from s.dimitrov at charter.net (slobodan Dimitrov) ([Leica] LA Review)