Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/01/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Le 13 janv. 10 ? 22:50, Mark Rabiner a ?crit : > >> >> Le 13 janv. 10 ? 13:57, Doug Herr a ?crit : >> >>> >>> Mark Rabiner wrote: >>> >>>> The fact that cropped format digital photography is not longer >>>> taken >>>> seriously by photographers and their art directors and editors is a >>>> fact not >>>> my quirky opinion. >>>> Its a fact and a well known one. And for quite some time. >>> >>> If this were true, why are you willing to spend hard-earned money on >>> a DX lens? >>> >> Sorry to intrude, but isn't DX the ideal FF lens for a D40? >> ph >> > Because its only 200 bucks the price of a replacement lens shade for > my > Leica 21 and I'd e shooting with it for 9 months. > Why not sell that 21 to get a D700? The D900 is soon out and prices are plumetting Phx (ie phuzzy format, particularly in the morning) > A D40 is DX cropped format. FX means FF full frame for nikon. > You can use a full frame lens on a cropped camrea but a cropped lens > is > optimized for the format and more ideal. It will be cheaper, lighter, > smaller ideally sharper. > > > Mark William Rabiner > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > NO ARCHIVE