Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/01/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]In my experience at SF-MOMA it depends on the exhibit. Photography is not forbidden in Avedon exhibit but it was prohibited in the Adams/O'Keefe gallery. I don't know why. Over the holidays I spoke with a relative who is a curator at the Smithsonian and she is VERY sensitive to the effects of high-light-levels on materials they are trying to conserve. If something is a one-of-a-kind, and it's highly valuable (unlike some of my prints), then I would assume you'd do everything you could to make sure it isn't destroyed by the very people attempting to enjoy it. If there is a non-linear relationship between light intensity and the destruction caused on a particular kind of work of art, then it would make sense to limit flash photography. I recall the Hopper exhibit at the National Gallery of Art was quite dimly lit except for the lights directly on the work and those weren't all that bright either. Clearly they were concerned about something. And maybe they are know-nothing knee jerk idiots who don't know diddly . . . but I sorta doubt that. I imagine there is real science involved although I might be unpleasantly surprised. Adam