Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/12/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Richard, The M3 is more confortable on my eyes than the M8, I think that this is the reason why the focus is more accurate, even if the lens is very old, it is from ca. 1949... What I see is the contrast and tonal differences, the film gives IMO more rich tones and contrast in B&W than digital..., maybe also I don't have enough skills on Capure One or Photoshop. Thank you for looking, and your comments Cheers Lluis El 12/12/2009, a las 1:07, Richard Man escribi?: > Clearly, use photoshop to copy the woman from the second picture to > the first picture. A masterpiece :-) > > Certainly, besides the DoF difference, very little discernible > differences? I like the more subtle tone of Illford, but that's > probably just my brain telling me what I want to hear. > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Lluis Ripoll Querol > <lluisripollquerol at gmail.com> wrote: >> From last Summer, same situation, 2 cameras, 2 different lenses, >> film and >> pixels... >> >> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Sitges/L1008100BW.jpg.html >> M8, probably with Tri Elmar >> >> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Sitges/2009060230.jpg.html >> M3, Zeiss Sonnar Opton, Ilford 50 ISO >> >> What do you think?.... >> >> Thanks... > > -- > // richard m: richard @imagecraft.com > // w: http://www.imagecraft.com/pub/Portfolio09/ blog: > http://rfman.wordpress.com > // book: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/detail/745963 > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information