Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/12/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Comparing film & digital
From: richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man)
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:07:32 -0800
References: <088CC2B3-F7C3-4C99-AD81-0550DE7DA14F@gmail.com>

Clearly, use photoshop to copy the woman from the second picture to
the first picture. A masterpiece :-)

Certainly, besides the DoF difference, very little discernible
differences? I like the more subtle tone of Illford, but that's
probably just my brain telling me what I want to hear.


On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Lluis Ripoll Querol
<lluisripollquerol at gmail.com> wrote:
> From last Summer, same situation, 2 cameras, 2 different lenses, film and
> pixels...
>
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Sitges/L1008100BW.jpg.html
> M8, probably with Tri Elmar
>
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Sitges/2009060230.jpg.html
> M3, Zeiss Sonnar Opton, Ilford 50 ISO
>
> What do you think?....
>
> Thanks...

-- 
// richard m: richard @imagecraft.com
// w: http://www.imagecraft.com/pub/Portfolio09/ blog:
http://rfman.wordpress.com
// book: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/detail/745963


Replies: Reply from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll Querol) ([Leica] Comparing film & digital)
In reply to: Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll Querol) ([Leica] Comparing film & digital)