Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/12/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]That's what I'm saying Mark - the f1 is remarkably flare resistant, the 0.95 less so. You can make the f1 flare, but it takes some concerted effort and I've never seen flare from that lens in normal use, unlike just about every other lens I've ever used. The f1 Noctilux ius definitely the most flare-resistant lens I've ever used. Marty On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote: >> I've compared the 0.95 and f1 Noctis. ?This review overlooks the two >> greatest optical differences: the f1 is more flare resistant, while >> the 0.95 has less (though not no) focus shift. ?On the more pragmatic >> side, there is also the $4-5K price difference. >> >> Marty > > > This implies incorrectly that the f1 has a flare issue. > The flare issue it has is that it doesn't flare. > Its one of the more flare resistant lenses many of us on the lug have ever > used. I think that was John Colliers may reason for using it. > Do I have a memory or WHAT?!? > > > Mark William Rabiner > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >