Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/12/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Noctiux - 0.95 vs 1.0
From: msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad)
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 18:00:24 -0800
References: <348513.98692.qm@web82103.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <003601ca7601$59c1d300$0d457900$@net> <BLU0-SMTP47AA61E1192E61F4AC7A308C910@phx.gbl> <4B1B0C61.8080207@comporium.net> <BLU0-SMTP34E4250BC83FBB8C8FCBEA8C910@phx.gbl>

how can you say this Vick with so much absolution! i know for a fact that in
early 2011 you will be chasing one.

On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Vick Ko <vick.ko at sympatico.ca> wrote:

> Absolutely.
>
> The f1.0 in my bag is better than any 0.95 that I won't ever own   :-)
>
>
> Vick
>
>
>
> Tina Manley wrote:
>
>> Vick Ko wrote:
>>
>>> Hmmm.  From reading the blog, the f1 is "good enough".  I don't see much
>>> motivating trading up to the f0.95.
>>> Better to get an M9.
>>>
>>> Vick
>>>
>> And I disagreed with most of his conclusions based on the photos shown!
>>  The 1.0 results looked better than the .95 in all of them, to me.  I'm
>> perfectly happy sticking with my 1.0.
>>
>> Tina
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
 -------------------------------------
 regards, mehrdad


Replies: Reply from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] Noctiux - 0.95 vs 1.0)
In reply to: Message from rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] Noctiux - 0.95 vs 1.0)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Noctiux - 0.95 vs 1.0)
Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] Noctiux - 0.95 vs 1.0)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Noctiux - 0.95 vs 1.0)
Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] Noctiux - 0.95 vs 1.0)