Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/12/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Noctiux - 0.95 vs 1.0
From: vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko)
Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 20:51:08 -0500
References: <348513.98692.qm@web82103.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <003601ca7601$59c1d300$0d457900$@net> <BLU0-SMTP47AA61E1192E61F4AC7A308C910@phx.gbl> <4B1B0C61.8080207@comporium.net>
 
Absolutely.

The f1.0 in my bag is better than any 0.95 that I won't ever own   :-)


Vick


Tina Manley wrote:
> Vick Ko wrote:
>> Hmmm.  From reading the blog, the f1 is "good enough".  I don't see 
>> much motivating trading up to the f0.95.
>> Better to get an M9.
>>
>> Vick
> And I disagreed with most of his conclusions based on the photos 
> shown!  The 1.0 results looked better than the .95 in all of them, to 
> me.  I'm perfectly happy sticking with my 1.0.
>
> Tina
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
Replies: Reply from msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad) ([Leica] Noctiux - 0.95 vs 1.0)
 In reply to: Message from rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] Noctiux - 0.95 vs 1.0)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Noctiux - 0.95 vs 1.0)
Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] Noctiux - 0.95 vs 1.0)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Noctiux - 0.95 vs 1.0)