Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/11/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses" JPEG &RAW????
From: rhart76 at gmail.com (Roger Hart)
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:18:02 -0500
References: <83E99E8D-A0BF-4C04-81E3-2780799D87EE@gmail.com> <00f201ca6210$9ee00240$dca006c0$@net> <16094F5A-9F8F-4AF0-98DB-EC96D849D31B@gmail.com> <8DD2D9BC569441A3B1D94E6BD93C6784@syneticfeba505> <BFD7A713DD4D4BB29AD2EC3ECF31D6D5@LENOVO73EC0E2F> <9962CCDEC6AE434B955619259201C8CB@syneticfeba505> <63F89EB9582648B2B9EAA4B00EFD24BA@jimnichols> <FF9F482F0B05443BAB2134F390B99C6E@syneticfeba505> <bcbe6fd0911111011q21af0208hc103665f66334e89@mail.gmail.com> <4AFB0E95.2030107@comporium.net>

Tina,

Maybe it's me, but I don't find any problem with the cameras slowing down
shooting both. I'm not shooting any sort of fast-paced action, and with
large-size memory cards as cheap as they are today, shooting both files at
the same time fits in with my workflow.

Roger Hart
Detroit

On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Tina Manley <images at comporium.net> wrote:

> Roger Hart wrote:
>
>> Ted,
>>
>> I sometimes shoot RAW and JPEG for one reason: to ship photos back to my
>> office where they are used on the web. Dumping JPEGS onto an FTP server is
>> much, much quicker than sending RAW files...and the 72 dpi web images
>> don't
>> need to start life as a RAW file. Being able to shoot both at the same
>> time
>> saves time converting the RAW files to JPEGs.
>>
>> Roger Hart
>> Detroit
>>
>>
> But converting them to jpeg at the same time you're editing them in LR any
> of a number of other photo editing programs is super easy and fast.  I 
> would
> never slow down shooting to get jpegs when they are so easy to make from
> converted RAWs!  RAW is all you ever need.
>
> Tina
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from simon.apekop at gmail.com (simon jessurun) ([Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses" JPEG &RAW????)
In reply to: Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses")
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses")
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses")
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses")
Message from jimlong5 at charter.net (Jim) ([Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses")
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses" JPEG & RAW????)
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses" JPEG &RAW????)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses" JPEG &RAW????)
Message from rhart76 at gmail.com (Roger Hart) ([Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses" JPEG &RAW????)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses" JPEG &RAW????)