Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/11/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] M9 reviews
From: steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour)
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:58:07 -0800
References: <19b6d42d0911092206s651863act51f9d2a6733723b3@mail.gmail.com> <ee8fa51c0911101656o5c385400p527ccf760c3cce99@mail.gmail.com>
 
On Nov 10, 2009, at 4:56 PM, Marty Deveney wrote:

>> Still we shouldn't get our undies yanked up wedgie-high because Dante and
>> Marty and some reviewers don' t like the thing. They make reasonable 
>> points.
> 
> Please don't misinterpret me - it is an amazing camera and Leica have
> done incredibly well to even make it happen.  I wish them all the
> best.  But it is not "perfect".  I like rangefinder viewing, so the
> camera suited me.  But there were things that Leica could have
> improved between the M8 and M9 that they didn't - I pointed these out
> - I think it's a camera reviewer's job to do that.

so now we can look forward to the M10...

-I think it's a camera reviewer's job to do that.

Steve



> 
> Marty
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies: Reply from s.dimitrov at charter.net (slobodan Dimitrov) ([Leica] M9 reviews)
 In reply to: Message from passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro) ([Leica] M9 reviews)
Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] M9 reviews)