Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/11/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses"
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:29:45 -0600
References: <C71F6A4A.585D2%mark@rabinergroup.com>

Only partly true Mark.

I've two Leica R to Canon adapters
and another on the way.
Use them when appropriate

Yes. It works. It's workable. It's possible. You can do it and  
achieve fine results.

However,
the moment one takes an R lens off the Canon
and puts the same lens on the R8/DMR
everything works flawlessly, as intended, again.
Dream come true.

And conversely,
with Canon lenses on Canon bodies
one does not compromise designed functionality of either body or lens.

Hacking bits and pieces of different systems together provides real fun
and useable yet compromised functionality.

Well there you are.
Back to systems designed and built to work with their various parts  
at full functionality.

Obviously at the price of the adapters
it makes sense to have them in your kit
if you have some favorite R glass.
But it remains a compromise of the designed functionality of the lens.

Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist

On Nov 10, 2009, at 6:06 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote:

> The people that have the most problem on this list with the Leitax  
> adaptors
> on the Canon and Nikons are the ones who've not used them.



Replies: Reply from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses")
Reply from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses")
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses")
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses")