Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/11/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I thought that was Minolta? On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 9:05 PM, slobodan Dimitrov <s.dimitrov at charter.net>wrote: > That would be an historical reversal, given that Canon used to make bodies > for Leica lenses. > S.d. > > > > On Nov 9, 2009, at 7:58 PM, mehrdad wrote: > > i don't even know why leica makes bodies these days. they can make lenses >> for all the other makes and in the process make a bundle >> >> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Frank Filippone <red735i at earthlink.net >> >wrote: >> >> >>> Good work Dante......I really enjoyed that... >>> >>> But you forgot... the Digi-R. The "other place" Leica can develop new >>> products for, and be able to sell them......and not cannibalize >>> anything..... >>> >>> Frank Filippone >>> red735i at earthlink.net >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> ------------------------------------- >> regards, mehrdad >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >