Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/11/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Why the mad rush / toxicity Ansel Adams donated his body
From: mak at teleport.com (Mark Kronquist)
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 11:47:40 -0800
References: <C71819F8.57F60%mark@rabinergroup.com> <A3306028-C1B0-4FD4-BF37-5901D1A320CF@gmail.com> <F7A89B679AEC4D529BE53CE61E4AFF96@jimnichols>

I believe Ansel Adams donated his body to science to research the  
effects of a lifetime of photo chemical exposure and there was no real  
negative impact on his major organ systems Wikipedia may have more
On Nov 5, 2009, at 10:15 AM, Jim Nichols wrote:

> Hi Steve,
>
> My darkroom exposure, like yours, was more than 40 years ago, and  
> was not extensive.  I never considered the toxicity of the chemical  
> exposure, thinking there was not much of a problem unless they were  
> ingested.
>
> My late father-in-law made his living from a small studio for a  
> number of years.  He hated gloves, so his nails were often  
> discolored, but he was not aware of other symptoms.  He was active  
> until he suffered a stroke at 90, and died at 91.
>
> Jim Nichols
> Tullahoma, TN USA
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Barbour" <steve.barbour at 
> gmail.com 
> >
> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
> Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 12:03 PM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Why the mad rush / toxicity
>
>
>> hi Mark and thanks,
>>
>> I am reading some of the current information and warnings...Back  
>> when  I worked in a photo darkroom in a very amateurish way, 40  
>> years ago,  there was no particular concern, no warnings, I took no  
>> special  precautions, 'cus the general feeling was that risk was  
>> low and  seemingly non-existent...
>>
>> at that time,  the idea that the chemicals either  by contact or by  
>> inhalation were inherently toxic, never dawned, was not at issue,  
>> even though I was a professor at that time on a medical school  
>> faculty, and trained in depth in biochemistry, molecular biology,  
>> microbial genetics...
>>
>> I have survived the intervening time without any obvious damage,  
>> but  my exposures were surely minimal compared to many.
>>
>> One has to think of the possible analogy with the story of Marie  
>> and Pierre Curie who won Nobel prizes for their work with  
>> radioactive compounds, but who had no idea of the associated  
>> serious risks, and suffered from these...at least severe burns, and  
>> Marie's death from aplastic anemia. (Pierre died prematurely from a  
>> fractured skull after  a street acident).
>>
>> So all this talk about toxicity and precautions is an eye opener  
>> for  me, and the concerns are admittedly tainted by the self  
>> serving  overreaction of regulatory agencies, as usual "a day late  
>> and a dollar  short"...
>>
>>
>> Steve
>>
>>
>>
>> On Nov 5, 2009, at 2:58 AM, Mark Rabiner wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>> On Nov 4, 2009, at 7:16 PM, Richard Man wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> What are you? A doctor?!!!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> yes, but.....
>>>>
>>>> I am reading all this stuff...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://www.subclub.org/darkroom/safety.htm
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> " Use tubes instead of trays for all processing. "
>>> Wildly delusional and totally out of the loupe would be thus my   
>>> opinion on
>>> the subclub.
>>> Fiber doesn't work with tubes and if they did you'd still not  
>>> want  to use
>>> them.
>>> Use rubber gloves with trays and you'll do fine making an effort  
>>> to  not
>>> smell the powders. If you know what it smells like its already   
>>> entered your
>>> body.  (Dektol vs. Hypo) Make sure you don't know. Know by reading  
>>> not
>>> smelling.
>>>
>>> Most people who have had darkroom problems come from a generation   
>>> (The 60's
>>> and before) where they used their hands not tongs and nobody  
>>> cared  about
>>> stuff like not breathing powders. Arthritis was what a lot of  
>>> these  guys
>>> seemed to have gotten from no tongs. Rarely anything else.
>>> 1 in 1000 gets Metol / Elon reactions. They need to stay out of  
>>> the darkroom
>>> but maybe go with Phenidone.
>>> Its the people who experimenting in alternate processes who run into
>>> trouble.
>>> Gum Bichromate. potassium dichromate is nasty stuff.
>>> Platinum printing maybe I think I heard will do  you in if your   
>>> stupid.
>>>
>>> But since the 70's at a college darkroom they made you be careful.
>>> That's when I switched from my hands to tongs.
>>>
>>>
>>> Mark William Rabiner
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] Why the mad rush / toxicity Ansel Adams donated his body)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Why the mad rush to use Canon or Nikon bodies?)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Why the mad rush / toxicity)
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] Why the mad rush / toxicity)